Noland, R.B. (2017). “A rejoinder to the critique of ‘Costs and Benefits of a Road Diet Conversion’.” Case Studies on Transport Policy. 5(1): 102-104.
This is a rejoinder to a critique by Le Vine (2017) of an evaluation of the costs and benefits of a road diet (Noland et al., 2015), previously published in Case Studies on Transport Policy. I respond to the six points made by Le Vine and conclude with a brief critique of existing practice.